Transcript
Professor Deborah Christie Hello, and thank you for joining me today on this webinar, which is looking at health coaching strategies to increase the motivation of adolescents. My name’s Deborah Christie. I’m a Professor of Paediatric and Adolescent Psychology, and I’ve been working with young people and their families for 30 years.
Not everyone who has the capacity to make decisions about their lifestyle in order to care for their health is either ready or willing to make these choices. This lack of interest is frustrating for both families and healthcare professionals, and for young people themselves, who can’t understand why caring for themselves might be important, but why they can’t see it as a priority and why they don’t have the confidence to put it into practice at different points in their life.
In order for somebody to be confident that they can change, they need to want to, and they need to be equipped with skills and abilities and resources that allow them to make those changes. An initial reaction of healthcare professionals is often just to educate people, to give them information about what people need to know, what people need to do. But for a significant percentage, not just of adolescents, but for us, as well, knowing why doesn’t mean that we do.
So, if you take a coaching stance with young people and you invite them to think about what changes they might want to make, when they would want to make them and how they could make them, and incorporate motivational interviewing, solution focused or narrative ideas, we can help young people start to resolve ambivalence and explore how their life could be different, if they choose to do so.
All of these approaches require us, as Psychologists and mental health professionals, to be thoughtful and skilful and to integrate our different treatment approaches to make sure that we provide something that works for the young people that we’re working with. A coaching stance works with ambivalence and resistance, two key aspects that are always present when we’re working with adolescents.
Today, we’re going to talk about this health coaching approach, this health coaching stance, and illustrate how it can structure interactions with adolescent clinics. We’re going to think about how to layer on motivational interview skills on top of this structure, as well as other interventions that you might want to use, both in remote and face-to-face consultations. And we’re going to talk about how to empower adolescent patients to understand and act on their data.
So, the first question we want to ask is, “How motivated are young people to do what we want them to do?” Here’s a young woman, 15 years of age, she wants certain things, to be independent, to be the same as other people, but because she has a condition, maybe diabetes, people keep reminding her about the things that she already knows, that she needs to check her bloods, that she needs to do injections. And her experience is that dealing with this condition, doing all of those things, is actually stopping her doing things that she wants to do.
My grandson was diagnosed with diabetes six months ago, he’s just 13. And he came round for lunch, and as we started weighing out the bread and the nachos and all of the things that had carbohydrates in them, he said, “I just want to be able to have a meal with my family without having to do all of this.” Like this young woman, he doesn’t want to think about doing things differently. And so, he’s already starting to ignore bits of his diabetes in favour of his normal adolescent life. But all of these young people know deep down that they can’t ignore things forever.
Just because we have facts, these facts don’t always fit what our beliefs are. And even though we have facts about what we have do in order to stay healthy, the beliefs that we have might be beliefs against change, beliefs in favour of not changing. Those beliefs might be about an intention not to change. A young person referred because of drinking too much might not want to stop drinking when they’re with their friends. They might see the advantages of the status quo, “If I stop drinking, my friends will all think I’m a loser.” They have a belief about how change can be disadvantageous, “Who am I going to hang out with if I stop drinking?” and they can be pessimistic about change. They could have a belief that nothing is going to help, particularly if they tried or they’ve done some counselling, and for them, it was just psychobabble, so why should they even bother coming to see you?
These beliefs drive negative comments, “You’ll never understand what it’s like,” “I don’t need to come here,” but they also drive other things, other behaviours, about treatment. So, you might get silence in the session, you might get telegraphic speech, they might just check their phone. They might not answer their phone when you send them a reminder, or when you call them to remind them about an appointment. Even if they’ve agreed to come to the appointment, they might not turn up. And the key thing is that they won’t reply to emails, because what we’ve learnt from some research we’ve been doing recently is that young people don’t look at their emails. They use all sorts of other mediums for communication but forget sending them emails.
How does this make you feel? Do you dread seeing this young person? Does your heart sink when you think about them, or when you talk about them in supervision? Everything that you’ve tried just doesn’t seem to work. Are you looking forward to seeing them in 15 minutes? This feeling of dread is one of the main drivers of burnout in healthcare professionals. And it’s one of the main drivers for not being able to work effectively with young people, because we have a belief that we have to right and fix things, we have to make things right, we have to fix it. We call it “the righting reflex,” the knee jerk response to make everything right. And what I’m going to suggest is that you let go of this.
Let’s think about when we’re working in a medical culture. If we’re part of a treatment team, as Psychologist, aspects of medical culture can really impact negatively on wellbeing. Remember that people experiencing higher stress levels are less creative and less agile, mentally, and that’s not just you, it’s the young person, as well. So, when we’re faced with a stressful consultation with somebody we’re concerned about and worried about and want to do well by, we become less creative and less agile, ‘cause we’re pushing and pushing to try and sort things out. When there’s that dominant paradigm of care, not just in medicine, but also often in mental health care, that involves solving things and fixing things, it isn’t always effective or appropriate. What we end up with is exhaustion, feelings of hopelessness, caught in that cycle of fixing that is incredibly depleting, and as I’ve said, contributes to core burnout.
So, if we were to take a breath, if we were going to let go of that righting reflex, if we were going to stop trying to fix things and we were going to adopt a health coaching stance, what would we be doing? So, we would be asking questions that invite the young person to have insight. We would be asking questions that help expand their thinking. We would ask questions that were non-rhetorical. We would use “what” and “how” more than “why.” In fact, I would often argue that we should just junk “why” completely, ‘cause “why” is implicitly judgemental. “Why aren’t you doing this?” However, we ask that question, whether we ask it in a nice, curious way, the implication is that we’re cross, and health coach questions are non-directive, they’re not leading. And you can only use this stance if you can accept the fact that the young person is going to go their way.
Now, we’re trying to get them to go the way that we want them to go, but this is not an approach for somebody that you are acutely concerned about. If you need to do something to save somebody, it’s not a health coaching situation. If somebody has a BMI of 14, this is not a case, a space, for health coaching. This is a space for you to do something to make them safe. A kid that’s about to walk into the road, we don’t have a conversation with them about it, we catch hold of their hand and keep them self. So, these questions are appropriate when you are prepared to accept the fact that the young person has got capacity and has got the permission to make their own decisions.
The next part of coaching, a health coaching stance, is listening to understand, not listening to respond. As we are actively listening, we’re being deliberate and effortful, we are just listening, not working out what we are going to say next. We have to be fully present in this moment, in the young person’s moment, and give full attention to them, not thinking, okay, what do I need to ask? What do I need to say? What’s a good question here? Listen to what they’re saying, to their whole person, to all of them, to their words, to the tone of their language, to the expression in their body language.
People are rarely really listened to. There’s a lovely expression, “Somebody just needs a good listening to,” but people rarely are listened to. I had a session yesterday with somebody, who started to cry at the very beginning of the session, when I had asked them to tell me what it was they were thinking about and what they wanted to think about with me. They’d been talking for about ten minutes, I hadn’t said anything at all, I had just listened, and they started to cry. And when they started to cry, I asked them what were the tears about, rather than assuming or jumping to understanding, or thinking that it was because they were sad. And what they told me was they were tears of gratitude, because they rarely got really listened to the way that I was listening. And this was over a Zoom call, so how you sit, how you look, how you catch their eye, your body language, matters even more in a Zoom call. And remember, when you’re listening to understand, what’s going to get in the way of it? You’re busy, you’re hungry, you’re worried about the next session. Remember, you need to be fully present.
So, I wanted to explain, first of all, the structure, the coaching structure, that a lot of Health Coaches, a lot of Coaches, use for a session. And you can use this in a 15 minute session the same way that you can use it in a 50 minute session. Start with, “What are you thinking?” and listen. When they get to the end of that wave of thinking, then ask, “So, what might be an attainable goal? What would you like to achieve today? When we get to the end of our conversation, where do you want to be?” Checking you’ve understood, summarise, and make sure that you’ve reflected back, using their words, what their goal is.
Then, what are the realities? What are the details for them about the situation? Some people will just talk, some people will just tell you what’s going on. But as they talk, they will start to realise that they’re making assumptions, and if you don’t interrupt them and give them the space to make those realisations, they will start to come up with their own solutions and options. And towards the end, “What are the obstacles and opportunities that you have discovered as a result of the conversation today?” And finally, the last question, “What will you do now? What is the way forward for you? Of these options and opportunities and obstacles, which are you going to address first, tomorrow, before I see you next?” So, TGROW gives us a structure.
Let’s see how we can layer over a motivational spirit. Motivational spirit is the basis, it’s the bottom of the triangle, it’s the bottom of the pyramid, of motivational interviewing. And you can see here that there are things that you do in motivational interviewing. I’m not going to teach them to you today, but I’m going to point out the importance of using spirit when you’re asking them. If you ask how to change questions or change talk without having these principles behind you, it will not be motivating, it will not be motivational.
So, let’s think about what is motivational spirit? So, an acronym for this is PACE, working in Partnership. I mentioned that Michael White said that “good therapy should feel like a conversation.” Working in partnership means that you have done your best to equalise the power dynamic, you are not doing something to this young person. You have a contract to work with them and be alongside them, rather than doing therapy to them.
Acceptance is the second part of working in the motivational spirit. And acceptance means acknowledging the absolute worth of the individual you’re working with, respecting them, as a human being. Acknowledging the strength and value in the present situation, not working towards telling them what they should be doing, or could be doing, but acknowledging them that right now – acknowledging with them right now that this present situation has value.
Autonomy is key in acceptance. You have to believe that the decisions that are made are down to that person you’re working with, it is their choice. They have the right to self-governance, and you are developing autonomy, and giving them autonomy, helping them understand that the solutions lie in their hands. Let’s also think about empathy. I often hear people say things, “Oh, well, you’ve got to be empathic and sympathetic, and that’s the important thing.” Actually, it’s not about feeling sorry. It – you might have concern for them, but sympathy is not what’s needed here, camaraderie is not what’s needed. If somebody is in distress, you need to be able to have empathy, and empathy is about acknowledging, understanding, feeling, connecting with the emotions, but not feeling sorry for them.
And that affirming stance, the last part of acceptance, is that you come into this relationship with the young person with an absolute affirmation of hope and optimism that behaviour change is possible and will take place. There have been times where I have said to young people, “Shall I hold onto hope for you? Why don’t we put it in a drawer here, so I’ve always got it?” or I ask them to tell me what hope looks like for them. I might share what hope looks like for me, an image of hope, when I hear them talk. I’ve even read “Hope is a Thing Like Feather,” the feather, a lovely poem about hope, and hope is a thing like a feather, to help people understand that hope is tenuous and difficult to get hold of it, but I believe in it, and I believe that it will happen. And then, I believe in that young person’s competence to change, and that’s why I have hope and optimism.
Compassion is the next thing that’s important, where we have kindness versus judgement, where we believe in humanity versus isolation, where we are mindful, rather than overidentifying with our own thoughts or feelings, or overidentifying with the feelings and thoughts of the young person. That we are able to be in the moment, and that we are able to encourage them to do so, as well. And, finally, Evoking intrinsic motivation. It’s not enough to create external reasons to change. The change much come from within, and that’s our role, using a motivational spirit.
So, here I can show you that these processes which are linked by values, engaging and focusing, evoking, planning, and then maintaining, can be mapped onto this structured coaching model. The first step is engaging. I’ve read many letters from other Psychologists that say, “The young person wouldn’t engage,” or have had a referral from another team because they’ve said, “The young person refused to engage,” or somebody’s discharged because “they wouldn’t engage.” It’s not the young person’s job to engage with you, it’s your job to engage the young person. And so, the beginning of any therapeutic relationship is to find ways to engage. It might be that you ask them to tell you, and ask the parents to tell you, what things are important them – important to them, right now. Is it about school? Is it about out – being outside of school? Is it about their friendships? Asking them about what their values are, finding out what values are family values, or values that they’ve developed as they’ve become an adolescent. Asking them to walk you through a typical day, explaining that in order to think about how you might support them, and help them find some solutions, you’d really like to understand what they’re having to live with right now.
And so, inviting stories of personal strengths, abilities and resources, gives us an opportunity to meet the person where they are, to meet the person and not meet the problem. The problem will come along, but we have to meet the person first, and this is, “What are you thinking about?” This is inviting them to begin by asking them what are their thoughts, what do they want to engage with today?
Our next value, our next stage, is creating a shared, collaborative focus. This needs to include everybody in the room. And it might in – also include people who aren’t in the room. It might include, for example, the Nurse that made the referral, what they might want the young person to be thinking about. It might be the Doctor that they’ve recently seen, who they didn’t get along with. Why do they think the Doctor would want them to come and meet with psychology? It might be a grandma or a granddad, somebody else who’s involved and cares for them.
And identifying the differences, validating that everybody will have maybe different goals and different focuses, but then, ultimately, coming back to, “So, what’s important to you? What do you want to be thinking about today? What do you want to achieve today? What is reasonable and possible for us to achieve?” And checking in that we’re on track for the goal, “Does today’s conversation fit with your values? Do we have the right pieces in order to reach that goal?” And “How are we going to work on it? Shall we just work with you, on your own, or would you like your parents to be with us?” I think sometimes families are always quite shocked that young people say, “I don’t want to meet with the Psychologist on my own. I actually want my mum and dad in the room with me so that they can help me, or I can help them understand what’s going on for me right now.” So often, in psychological services, we think we have to pull the young person in and fix them and work with them because their inner world is what we must be focus on. Actually, we need to ask the young person, how do they want to work?
Our next step, our next stage, is understanding what the reality is, and we do this by evocation, by evoking, and this takes time. This isn’t always going to happen in one session. Using motivational questions to build commitment to change and build motivation to change, hearing and addressing and validating ambivalence. “On the one hand, you really, really want to not have to come and see me, but, on the one hand, at the moment, everyone’s so worried about you, it’s hard not to be brought to psychology sessions. On the one hand, you want to keep yourself well because you value your independence and, on the one hand, it’s very difficult to manage your medication regimen.” And as we do these, as we put these bricks in, as we start to think about short-term needs and long-term goals and values, we start to identify change talk, and we find ways to affirm what their reality is and how they want to start making changes, driven by intrinsic motivation.
Somebody described motivational interviewing as “Plucking change talk out of the jaws of ambivalence.” I really like this idea, and I guess I was thinking, what are the things that we need to be constantly looking for when we’re having a conversation with somebody? There’s a nice acronym, it’s DARNCAT, and DARNCAT stands for looking for Desire statements, “I want to,” “I wish to.” Looking for Ability statements, ability to change, “I could do this,” “It’s possible it could do it.” Looking for Reasons to change, “I need to do this because,” “I’m going to do it because,” “If I don’t, then something else will happen,” and really mining for needs, “What are the consequences? Why do you need to change?” And once we’ve established there is desire and ability and reason and a need, we then move into commitment, looking for commitment, “I must do this, “I must do it,” “I will do it because.” Action statements, “I will do the following things,” and timing, “I will do it next week,” “I will do it every day next week,” “I will do it in the morning and the afternoons.” I used to work with young people where if I got them to the point where they were able to say to me, “I will do one blood sugar a day,” we had made a major, major progress and achievement, because when they’d arrived, they’d been doing none. So, it’s not about big change, it’s about small change, but it’s commitment to that small change that really matters.
Using motivational interviewing, reflecting skills and abilities, for those of you that are familiar with these, it’s a form of summarising, it’s a form of feeding back and showing that you’re listening to understand, and not to respond. And summarising every, maybe, ten/15 minutes. There aren’t any rules about how frequently or how often you’re supposed to summarise, but I like to think of it in this way, as picking the flowers and handing them back as a bouquet. “I’ve heard that you want to change, and that you know that you could, because this matters to you, because you need to do something in order to live your life the way that you want to.” “I’ve heard you say that you are committed to change and that you’re going to do the following things.” And that summarising must acknowledge ambivalence. It’s not about being that, sort of, toxic positivity, that everything’s hunky dory, everything’s okay. It’s about acknowledging that there will be times when people don’t want to do things, but – about being specific, affirming and acknowledging those statements of change. But also acknowledging that if something doesn’t happen, if it doesn’t follow through, then what are they going to do? If they don’t make it on day one, is that a disaster, or how about, if they don’t do it on day one then they just do it on day two and three? And “I’m optimistic you can do this,” having those statements of hope and optimism in there.
We want to invite young people to tell us what are their options. Do you remember that slides that showed the O for TGROW, it’s, “What are the possible obstacles, what are the options, what are the opportunities?” and then asking, “What are you going to do next?” But it’s their plan, it’s not your plan, it’s theirs. So, not giving too much, you’re not trying to fix it, not going from doing nothing to doing everything all in one week. Doing more than a little, a bit like Goldilocks, getting it just right. But, also, be prepared to alter it, “If it doesn’t work out this week, that’s okay. Do you know what? We’ll change it.” Being clear that this is an experiment and that it’s just an experiment, and sometimes experiments work and sometimes they don’t. So, when you see them next, “Let’s look at the bits that worked.” Bring in that solution-focused idea that you will only think about the bits that went well, and then you’ll be able to do more of them, rather than somebody feeling that they’re going to come along and tell you that they’ve failed.
What about giving information? How do we give information, ‘cause sometimes we have to? Sometimes we’re in a situation where we want to share results, or we want to ask people to tell us what they know, or we want to tell them some information. The key way of doing this, using a motivational interviewing, and also a health coaching, is to ask for permission. “Is it okay if I give you a couple of my ideas? When I’ve been listening to you today, I had some thoughts. Would you be interested in hearing about those thoughts?” So, you might say, “Is it okay if we talk about your test results?” And this is one of the few times that you use a closed question, because you are asking for yes or no permission.
And if somebody says, “No, I don’t want to talk about my test results,” then you can ask them another question, which is, “So, how would you like me to get those test results to you so you can look at them, or think about them, or understand them?” They’ve said they don’t want to talk about them, but you need to let them have them, so ask them how do they want to get them? If somebody says they’re not interested in finding out more about smoking, then you could say, “It would be really helpful for me if I could understand what you already know about smoking and asthma. Could you tell me a little bit about what you’ve already been told, or what you’ve looked at on the internet, for example?” And when you’re giving information, give it in a chunk, one piece of information, and then say, “How does that land? What does that make you think about?” If you’ve got a reflection, then give the reflection and say, “So, having shared my ideas with you, I wonder what your thoughts are about it?” So, take it away from you, and give it back to them, so that they are now back in control of the conversation. What we’re trying to do here is empower young people to understand and act on their data. So, we want to highlight choice, we want to say to them things like, “No-one can force you to do this,” if that statement is true. We want to ask them, “What choices do you have?” Because they always have choices. We need to clarify our position as a guide, “I’m here to help you think through your options. I’m not here to talk about things in a judgmental way. So, what I wanted to talk about is the fact that you’ve been referred because of drinking,” or, “you’ve been referred because injecting is difficult.” Rather than saying, “You’ve been referred because you drink too much,” or, “You’ve been referred because you don’t inject.” So, always giving information, always making statements that are non-judgmental, and guiding and supporting.
We’ve talked a lot about eliciting their ideas, “How do you want to take things forward?” That’s something I always ask young people at the end of a session. For those of you that do transactional analysis, I’m putting them into an adult position, in many ways, I’m working – trying to work with them as an adult to adult. I’m not telling them they have to come. I’m not putting them into a parent/child position, “I need to see you next week,” which would be that, but “How do you want to take things forward?” And then supporting autonomy. So, rather than using “we” statements, and saying, “We are going to do this together,” or, “We can have this plan.” “Your plan is,” using “you.” “You can do this,” “You’ve said you would like to do this, and you want your first step to be,” so it’s not you, ‘cause it’s not your goal, and it’s not your plan, it’s theirs.
Resistance, you’ve worked so hard, you’ve done all of these steps and you’ve still got to the point where they’re saying, “I don’t want to do it,” “I’m not interested,” “I don’t want to work with you,” “I don’t care,” “Nothing helps.” Those are beautiful examples of resistance statements, and resistance, rather than being futile, is inevitable. So, if we’re faced with resistance, the very first thing to do is stop and think, what am I doing to fan the fire of resistance? It’s probably that you’ve made some incredibly directive statement, you’ve just told them something to do, you’ve moved out and away from a motivational position.
So, you need to stop, and then you do a drop, and there are three bits to dropping. The first is to show that you have accurate empathy. “You’re feeling pretty frustrated today,” affirming the behaviour, “but despite this, you still have agreed to come and talk with me, you still decided to come here today, you still got out of bed and caught the bus” or “the Tube to come and visit with me.” And then, an apology, “I am sorry that you feel angry about coming here, I am sorry that you feel that things aren’t helping.” Accurate empathy, affirmation and apology, that’s the first drop, the one down.
And then you roll. Those of you that do martial arts will know about the – a judo roll, it’s the same principle, that you use the energy of the person coming towards you to roll, so, acknowledging ambivalence. “So, on the one hand, you are really, really depressed and unhappy, and, on the one hand, you really want things to be different,” but emphasising all the time that – and this is key in rolling, emphasising autonomy, “You know, ultimately you decide how to use the time we’ve got together, you decide the things that you want to work on, and what do you think needs to change for things to be better? Is it other people?” And often with teenagers, it’s, “I’ve – the – I want my parents to stop nagging me,” “I want my Teachers to stop picking on me,” “I want people to stop bullying me.” It is often about external, and then we can think about, “Well, do we have any control over them? You know, what do you – you know, what ways do you think, you know, you could do something about those people? If you don’t have any control over them, who do you have control over?” So, always coming back to emphasising that they have the choice about themselves, and that’s the bit that you’re giving them, and that’s the bit that they have to hold onto.
Now, once you’ve got good at stop, dropping and rolling, you find yourself back on track, and you go round in this, sort of like, circle at times, and then you can start to use your other skills, that you’re – used or evoking, and planning. But you might get to a point where you do, kind of, think, actually, do they really want to change? And I remember asking a girl if she wanted to change, and she said, “No, I don’t really want to change.” So, I asked her did she want to want to change, and she said, “Well, hmmm, I’m not sure I want to want to.” So, I then said to her, “Do you want to want to want to change?” And she looked at me, and she nodded very thoughtfully, and she said, “Yeah, that’s it, I want to want to want to change.” So, what we did was, we did a decisional balance, where we looked at the pros and the cons. Now, those of you who do motivational interviewing will know that you can use a simple pros of change, cons of change, just on one hand and on the other hand. But you can also do the pros of no change and the cons of no change, and then you can do the pros of change and the cons of change, so you can make four columns. What you want to really focus on, to start with, is the counter-change talk. So, “Why do you want – what are the pros of not changing? Why do – why should we just stay – why should things stay as they are?” And that’s a way of building rapport, because you start to understand the barriers. You know, young people don’t want to, you know, stop hanging out with kids that get them into trouble, because those kids are good fun, those kids are the ones that they like being with, those are the ones that understand them. And you can start to say, “So, that’s, kind of, at the moment where you’ve got your friendship group.” And then you can move, once you’re really taken your time to understand the counter-change talk, you then can move to direction for change. “Well, look, let’s think about how life could be then, let’s think about what the pros of changing your peer group might be, and what the cons of not changing are going to be. If you don’t change, what are the negative consequences?” So, you start to reframe, and you start to affirm the ability of the young person to see difference.
The final bit is, obviously, maintenance. The bits that are in between is where the change occurs. But change is a journey, and you travel throughout your lifespan, and that idea of two steps forward, one step back, is always true when we’re working with young people who are struggling with change. So, what we need to do is review it, “What’s gone well? What’s not gone so well? How did you make the two steps forward in the first place? One step back, I understand, I can understand how it’s frustrating to have gone one step backwards, but, you know, other young people do that.” So, responding with empathy and non-judgment. And, most important, framing that relapse as, “just a setback, it’s not the end of the world, you haven’t got all the way back to where you were beginning. It’s a small slip, it’s a small hiccup.” I like this phrase, even if I wasn’t keen on the person who said it, but, “You have to fight a battle more than once to win it.” So, here are 12 Top Tips to Motivate and Support Change. Let’s start with the counter-change, first of all, don’t present as the expert, don’t try and convince or persuade. I’ve said this, don’t use “we” language for goals and plans. It’s not “we,” it’s “them.” But don’t miss opportunities for discussions of values, if you feel or hear a word that’s about a value, ask, “Is that a value? Does that matter to you?” Bring that in, and do not provide the consequences of decisions or actions. I read a tweet the other day of somebody with diabetes who’d been offered a tour of the amputation ward. I can tell you, not only do they not want to go, it’s not going to change their behaviour. What about dumping information? Don’t, don’t dump, but don’t avoid information or feedback opportunities. Look out for the young person asking for that and think about whether that information can promote or change or support a plan.
So, my last six statements about what you do need to do to motivate and support change. Clarify your role as a guide, offer “you” statements, and emphasise personal choice and control. Promote their personal responsibility and emphasise the importance of their values, their goals and their plans. Elicit from them what would be the consequences of any decisions or actions that they make or take, and when you’re giving information and feedback, then use ask, tell and ask. And use menus of options when discussing plans. There’s never just one good option, there are always lots.
I hope you find these tips useful, and I hope you’ve enjoyed listening to today’s webinar. Thank you for your time.